On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 10:12 -0400, Mike Holstein wrote: > finally we get to the bottom line. we actually *are* having the > 'analog vs digital' debate. theres no need to have that debate here. > > > the issue im trying to highlight is advocacy ralph. if you want to > discount *all* digital recording methods, go for it. if i had the > money, time, patience and space, i would quite enjoy having an analog > setup. but, for now, digital recording is SO much easier for me to > deal with. and for others who come to this list, and others you > communicate with, this is the case as well. most audio production is > done digitally these days, and i feel like it is important for us as > ubuntu users to help promote the tools we have. ALSO, using terms like > "pro-fools" to refer to protools is unnecessary. we probably have > users here that are using both protools and ardour, or maybe protools > on their production machines, and looking at ubuntu on a desktop > platform. i feel like this is an unnecessary alienating step. > personally, i dont use protools, but that doesnt mean that its use is > "wrong". and to imply that is not a 'community building' attitude. > > > i would like to think that any audio professional or home user using > whatever OS or proprietary software could come to this list, and feel > welcome. and i would like to ask all the long-time users to become > ambassadors, embracing the technology we have, and helping spread the > positives, as well as internally helping address and resolve the > negatives. > > Seconded. I'm using Ubuntu Studio because it's the only viable route for me at present. Should some miracle occur and I turn professional then I would probably look again, with expert advice, but for now the choice is Ardour because : a) it works and b) I can afford it.
Cheers. > > -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
