2011/10/25 Matthew East <m...@ubuntu.com>: > On 21 October 2011 13:11, Kenneth Nielsen <k.nielse...@gmail.com> wrote: >> It also seems that the consensus is that we should have to full packs and >> that the first one should definitely be one and then I would suggest making >> either the fourth or the fifth one as well. > > Just by way of a gentle protest, can I complain that the language pack > was gone ahead with today ahead of schedule *despite* a careful > consultation process during which no objections were made as to the > proposed timing, and *without* any advance warning. Fortunately I read > the scrollback in #ubuntu-translators and found out about this before > doing the work for an ubuntu-docs upload. But it's still a bit > annoying as I have wanted to do an ubuntu-docs upload this time around > to fix some bugs as well as translations, and these will now have to > wait 4 weeks. > > Not too big a deal, but badly handled.
Hallo Matthew This is my bad and I apologize for the inconvinience. I got stated on the schedule a little to late and was really keen on getting a set of language pack ready before the UDS. I was also a little fuzzy on the procedure when including the docs translations, but as I can understand from Martins email, it should still be possible to to get everything in there before the UDS. I'll try to handle the next updates better. Regards Kenneth _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-translations-coordinators Post to : ubuntu-translations-coordinators@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-translations-coordinators More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
