Personally, I think Linus is being short-sighted. When we have much, much more power, and companies are actively begging to support Linux, THEN we make the switch. This would push them, through their clamouring, to create open specs at the very least, or better, to release GPL drivers.
I do believe that open drivers are incredibly important. When we start encouraging closed drivers, as the provision allows, new companies to support the kernel (with their up-and-coming hardware that everyone has) will not release specs, nor will they release the code (as that would inherently imply releasing the specs). We need to keep our freedom to see the code, and I am willing to limit my and others' freedom to use whatever binaries they wish; be they from open, or closed, source. On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 11:37 +0000, alan c wrote: > Non-GPL Linux Kernel Modules Banned Starting January 2008 > http://www.osnews.com/story.php/16720/Non-GPL-Linux-Kernel-Modules-Banned-Starting-January-2008/ > > I am not technically into any of the details, and have never even > compiled a kernel etc, or much at all, but - this sounds a bit like > extremism which might have a significant effect on real life users who > want things to 'just work'. > > I note Linus' response which I find a bit reassuring, but I do hope > the more 'common' end of common sense can prevail, particularly in ubuntu! > -- > alan cocks > Kubuntu user#10391 > -- Help me get to Venezuela! http://tibsplace.co.uk/venezuela -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/
