Mac wrote: > I hope we can just assume this is FUD. Does anyone more familiar with > server security have anything consoling thoughts? > I seriously hope that we DON'T assume this is FUD.
I think that Alan has summed up the key issue nicely. Anyone who goes around saying "Linux is secure, Windows isn't" is, I'm afraid, setting themselves up for a MASSIVE egg-on-face incident. What we CAN say is that "Ubuntu contains a good set of tools to keep machines secure that are free. You don't need to worry about installing three different update packages, each with a monthly subscription fee." M. -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/
