On 25/10/2007, Tony Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Pete,
>
>
> On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 09:28 +0100, Pete Stean wrote:
> > yes I can report that Virtualbox is much improved, and faster than
> > VMware (at least on my machine) - this product is maturing nicely, so
> > it might be time for a switch. Why not check it out and see what you
> > think...
>
> I rather like the way vmware-server operates in that the virtual machine
> stays running in the background even if I log out and I can just connect
> to it either locally or remotely. In my brief experience with
> virtualbox, it seems it doesn't operate in quite the same way. If it
> did, I would definitely switch.
>
> Regards,
> Tony.
> --
> Tony Arnold, IT Security Coordinator, University of Manchester,
> IT Services Division, Kilburn Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL.
> T: +44 (0)161 275 6093, F: +44 (0)870 136 1004, M: +44 (0)773 330 0039
> E: [EMAIL PROTECTED], H: http://www.man.ac.uk/Tony.Arnold
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
> https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/
>
I was looking to install Vi
--
Kris Douglas
Softdel Limited Hosting Services
Web: www.softdel.net
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/
