2008/10/21 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [quote] > it may be a good >>> candidate for backporting to Intrepid (and perhaps Hardy) > [/quote] > > maybe hardy...... hardy should be a priority as people who have rolled out > an LTS release who plan to stick with it for at least 2 years to maximise > the LTS features should not be stuck with outdated software that is a big > improvment (not saying upgrade everything). >
If you want latest software, you don't want LTS. > I don't understand why LTS release are just stuck on the back burner - > what is the point of LTS if it's not going to be maintained and kept as > current as possible for people investing in it. > People tend to implement LTS in order to have a stable (non changing) platform which they can be sure wont be changing massively during the lifecycle of the product. Introducing a whole new version of a product part way through the cycle for an LTS release is exactly the _opposite_ of what should be done. Cheers, Al. -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
