Codenames are not designed to survive post release: "Since the actual release date is not known until it's ready and humans tend to prefer names rather than numbers, a set of codenames are used by developers and testers during the buildup to a release:"
from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DevelopmentCodeNames -- Tony Scott http://tonyscott.org.uk | http://twitter.com/tonys | http://2011.portsmouth.wordcampuk.org | http://lpd.bectu.com | http://orangecoconut.com >________________________________ >From: Alan Bell <alanb...@ubuntu.com> >To: UK Ubuntu Talk <ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com> >Sent: Monday, 13 June 2011, 10:54 >Subject: Re: [ubuntu-uk] What's In A Name? > >On 13/06/11 08:44, Avi Greenbury wrote: >> >>> it is called "Ubuntu 11.04", it is *not* officially called "Ubuntu >>> Natty Narwhal". Mac was codenamed "Snow Leopard" until it was >>> officially released, where-upon it became "OSX 10.6". >> >> Really? >yes, really. >https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DevelopmentCodeNames >> I thought both 'Natty Narwhal' and 'Snow Leopard' are names intended to >> survive post-release. Certainly Apple is talking about 'OSX Lion' in the >> store, though I've just noticed a distinct lack of 'Natty' on ubuntu.com. >> > > >-- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com >https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk >https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/ > > > -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
