-- Sent from my Nokia N900 Please do not send me word documents plain txt or pdf are prefered.
----- Mensaje original ----- > I think you may be able to fix this by creating a symbolic link to where > the program is expecting to find the library. As for where it would be > looking, I have no idea... One would assume one of the developers could > shed some light, or perhaps an installation guide or readme file. > On Jul 26, 2011 7:13 PM, "Simon Redmond" <si...@sibass.co.uk> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 19:30 +0200, mart...@vandestreek.net wrote: > > > On 26 July 2011 14:32, Andrés Muñiz Piniella <andre...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > We are trying to install a software (coventorware) that > > > normally is supported if installed in redhat 4 but "should > > > work" on other linux distros like ubuntu. > > > > > > We managed to install everthing but there is one library that > > > is missing: libgomp.so.1. And we think it's called > > > libgomp(something) in ubuntu (already installed). it seems > > > they are spelt slightly differently. How would I get the > > > coventorware installer to find libgomp? > > > > > > > > > This could be two different problems: > > > > > > > > > 1. You're really missing the library. Try installing "apt-file", then > > > do "apt-file update" and "apt-file search libgomp123.so" (replace > > > with the file name you need) to see which package it's in > > > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > > 2. The software you're trying to run is compiled for 32-bit Linux, > > > and you're running 64-bit LInux. If you install libraries using > > > "apt-get install" you get the 64-bit versions, which can't be used > > > by 32-bit compiled programs. You either need to get a version of > > > your software that's compiled for 64-bit Linux, get the 32-bit > > > libraries on your system somehow, or install 32-bit Ubuntu and try > > > with that. > > > > > > > > > Martijn > > > > > > > I might be wrong, but this sounds like it could be solved by a symbolic > > link??? > > > > Simon > > > > > > I think you may be able to fix this by creating a symbolic link to where > the program is expecting to find the library. As for where it would be > looking, I have no idea... One would assume one of the developers could > shed some light, or perhaps an installation guide or readme file. So, this symbolic link would it be this? http://www.techiecorner.com/105/how-to-create-symbolic-link-in-unix/ readme says that they only support redhat of the linux distros. Instalation guide is a simple block diagram. Says something in the lines choos folder. Type this and that, should be installed. Create desktop shortcut... I guess i could just install redhat... But the last time i used redhat it looked so dated compared to ubuntu.
-- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
