* *
2011/10/4 Juan J. <reid...@usebox.net> > On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 12:45 +0100, Colin Law wrote: > > [...] > > > Thanks for the advice Avi > > > > > > "On an entirely unrelated note, your signature amused me. I've never > seen > > > a company both explain how insecure email is and assume it's secure > > > in the same wall of signature." > > > > > > ^^^^^^ It doesn't? It's stating that the information maybe > confidential. i.e. relating to legal proceedings, the insecure email notice > acknowledges that during transit or storage the email contents could change > and I'm not liable. -- Think forensics. > > > > So just who is the "intended recipient" who is allowed to access, > > disclose, copy, distribute or rely on the contents? All the rest of > > us could easily commit a criminal offence by so doing, apparently. > > The amusing part is that instead of signing the mails with any of the > available standards (S/MIME, PGP/GPG; any other else?), there's a notice > stating that the message (including the notice) may have been modified > by a third party :) > > Cheers, > > Juan > > > > -- > ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/ > Okay, Okay. I give in. It could be clearer as to what I mean. I'll re-write it. Best Regards, Dave Hanson <http://hansonforensics.co.uk/>
-- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/