Elizabeth Krumbach writes:
> To quickly jump in with my opinion: I've both been part of successful
> teams and am currently in a leadership team where the 3 leadership
> option is working and am highly in favor of it. Not only does it serve
> to help spread the leadership responsibilities among several people
> (thus lessening the leadership workload and bottlenecks all around),
> it helps do a better job of properly representing the team as a whole.
I am also in a 3-person leadership team (not the same one as Lyz,
though I'm familiar with that group too) and the arrangement has
worked very well. It makes life much easier for the leaders -- we
can share out responsibilities, and if someone goes on vacation or
needs a break for a while, it's no problem -- and it seems less
prone to lead to drama and strife than a single leader. I would
definitely recommend the arrangement, especially in a group that's
had past conflicts over leadership.
...Akkana
--
Ubuntu-us-ca mailing list
Ubuntu-us-ca@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-us-ca
