On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Brian Murray <br...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 05:07:00PM -0800, Walter Lapchynski wrote: >> I'm thinking of making the focus on our Jam on QA, i.e. testing and >> bug triage as a whole workflow towards providing useful feedback to >> developers. Anyone think we should do something else?
> While I think helping with bug triage is a useful thing, I think there > can be a longer feedback loop between getting a bug to a complete state > and having it fixed by a developer. Subsequently, I think it might be > more rewarding to work on a process with a shorter feedback loop like > the verification of Stable Release Updates. True if all the contributors need instant gratification. I'm not sure they do. But we can certainly work on both! > Another nice thing is people who aren't running the development release > will have something to do. (Yes, you can improve bugs if you aren't > running the development release, but you can't really test to see if > they exist in it.) Well, with a virtual machine, you can pretty much handle 90% of bug testing. > Either way I'm happy to help with either or both activities. Ooh, you're going to be there? -- @wxl Lubuntu Release Manager, Head of QA Ubuntu PPC Point of Contact Ubuntu Oregon LoCo Team Leader -- Ubuntu-us-or mailing list Ubuntu-us-or@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-us-or