I did the debugging work because I thought you (or upstream) might find
it useful.  Plenty of lockups have been reported but not many where it's
possible to observe a faulty kernel or hardware state in detail.

Specifically, because of the clues in how the kernel or hardware state
was broken and X server restart didn't recover it, I though you or
upstream developers would find it useful.

But it appears that was a mistake since you weren't interested in
analysis, just whether running Karmic for a month locks up less often.
(Running it for a day would not be enough).

In other words, if I'd just reported it locking up, your response would
have been exactly the same: try Karmic, see if it's more reliable.

I'm not sure what response you were waiting for, other than 'I ran
Karmic and don't get (as many) lockups'.

Instead I turned off DRI entirely (on Jaunty), and I get far fewer
lockups but have still had one, unfortunately.  Presumably the one I had
subsequently was a different kind, as the one in this report depends on
DRI.

==> So, I have a question: If I do experience lockups when I eventually
move to Karmic and re-enable DRI, and it's not a complete system freeze
so possible to debug like in this report, should I spend the hours doing
that or is it not useful here?

Thanks!

Btw, why is the new status Invalid and not Closed?  This report may be
useful to someone else who comes searching in future, especially if the
problem reappears, and Invalid bugs tend to be skipped over when
searching.

-- 
[i945GM] X server gets stuck in loop waiting on DRI, reads mouse events but 
ignores all socket I/O hence appears frozen
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398968
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in ubuntu.

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
Post to     : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to