Launchpad has imported 1 comments from the remote bug at https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60143.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2013-02-01T05:42:28+00:00 Daniel van Vugt wrote: Calling gbm_bo_create() with format == GBM_BO_FORMAT_ARGB8888 completes successfully. However reading back the format via gbm_bo_get_format() returns GBM_BO_FORMAT_XRGB8888. The problem seems to be that the bo internal structure is initialized to zero by calloc, but the format field is never set by gbm_dri_bo_create, so it stays zero (GBM_BO_FORMAT_XRGB8888) even when the real image format is something different. Should be a simple fix in gbm_dri_bo_create(). Just add: bo->base.base.format = gbm_dri_to_gbm_format(dri_format); Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/1112147/comments/1 ** Changed in: mesa Status: Unknown => Confirmed ** Changed in: mesa Importance: Unknown => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1112147 Title: gbm_dri_bo_create fails to initialize bo->base.base.format To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mesa/+bug/1112147/+subscriptions _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
