It dawned on me that a "proposed replacement" might lack such an, um, "feature" of hardwired 96 dpi. Now if that will be called progress I'll invest some time into finding those who arranged that and ruining their remnants of reputation.
(creating and improving is vastly more important but the feeling of impunity results in *evil* things, unfortunately) Folks, hey let's just get this crap fixed, are you still listening to the community? XFree86 project used to skip that at times, please don't. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xorg-server in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589485 Title: Ignores physical display size and calculates based on 96DPI To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xorg-server/+bug/589485/+subscriptions _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
