I don't think we should change around the libxfont and libxfont1 source packages in SRU; this would e.g. make it more confusing to try to do security updates of libxfont in xenial if necessary. It also doesn't look to me like the version bump from libxfont 1.5.1 to libxfont1 1.5.2 is justified under SRU policy.
I would prefer to see: - libxfont source SRU, renaming libxfont-dev to libxfont1-dev - libxfont2 introduced as a new source package, which can be the libxfont from artful with a source rename. For now, rejecting these two uploads from the queue pending discussion. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1687981 Title: Backport packages for 16.04.3 HWE stack To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1687981/+subscriptions _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
