On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 19:06 -0700, br...@canonical.com wrote: > Target Versions for Release > --------------------------- > kernel: 2.6.38 > x-server: 1.10 [1] (Feb 2011) > mesa: 7.10 (Dec 2010) > libdrm: 2.3.23 [2] (Dec 2010)
Sounds great! git HEAD stuff is pretty stable at the moment, and I've been banging on some performance tracing work for my own GL application writing. Chris Wilson has been pushing a lot of good stuff to the Intel driver (aside from the current focus of Intel development, which seems to be Sandybridge bring-up). There have been a few regressions at times, but Alexy Fisher and I have been picking them up running xorg-edgers and latest kernels (I have been back-porting drm from the intel git repo into the Maverick kernel). > gnome: 3.0 (Dec 2010) gnome-shell runs like a snail here, but it is just usable. Unity is better, although gnome-shell feels a lot more polished in some areas. Desktop management is better in gnome-shell, as is the sidebar in general (although I can't stand the Unity one, so am biased). Unity wins in many other regards though. Will Unity be compiz based by Natty? There are a lot of accessibility bits which are nice on compiz, such as colour filters / saturation controls / window inversion etc.. Are we likely to see any PPAs for Wayland this time around? > 1: May go with x-server 1.9 if release is late or includes risky > changes. Will review and decide at end of 1.10's merge window. > 2: Will go with version as required by mesa 7.10. > -- Peter Clifton Electrical Engineering Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 9, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FA Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!) Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me) -- Ubuntu-x mailing list Ubuntu-x@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-x