Gdal is in trusty already (since tonight). https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdal
Johan On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Ivan Mincik <ivan.min...@gmail.com> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 11/22/2013 06:23 PM, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:16:50AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine >> wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:01:39AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: >>>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 17:16:03 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 04:27:41PM +0200, Francesco Paolo >>>>> Lovergine wrote: >>>>>> BTW, without annoying all of you with a so looooooong >>>>>> history about this issue, I'm going to introduce a new >>>>>> libgdal1h binary package (h means hidden, better >>>>>> suggestions are welcome :)), with a new SONAME libgdal.1h >>>>>> to manage a decent migration to the new flavor. This will >>>>>> sacrifice third-parties sw compatibility, but well, who >>>>>> cares? It would be break anyway. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Maybe a better choice in this specific case would be >>>>> introducing a new binary package (libgdal1h) that >>>>> Conflicts/Breaks against libgdal1 and provides the usual >>>>> library with the usual name/soname. Of course, that will >>>>> force a lot of bNMUs and an explicit unblocking set to >>>>> complete the transition properly. Make sense? >>>> I must admit from your mails I don't really understand what >>>> your plan is. Do the packages currently in experimental follow >>>> that plan? >>>> >>> >>> Yes, at least the still pending in NEW queue (it has a proper >>> fix). I would simply provide a new libtary package that provides >>> the usual library name/soname and conflicts with the old one. >>> That will require a good amount of bNMUs for rdepends. >>> >> >> After a couple of new releases in experimental, it is now time of >> pushing this change ASAP in sid. RMs, could you please give an ack >> about that? As said, we will need to ask for a long list of bNMUs >> after release in sid. >> > > Dear Francesco and Bas, I was trying to read all possible information > (bug reports, debian/changelog, mailing list) about the libgdal1h > issue and transition, but still, it is not clear for me what the > current state is and what it needs to be done to complete this task. > > Please, could you summarize current situation ? Is it possible that > GDAL 10 packaging will be fully completed soon enough to get to Ubuntu > 14.04 LTS in best shape ? > > Thanks a lot for your work. > > - -- > Ivan Mincik > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSwtTfAAoJEPfdLsR5UpoewwkH/21PGRkViUY5WcbEANL5J9Ln > KP8GXUQU45TDeM+Wlq4VI5XHxDP82Ge+acMl85tjv7Psx2NStWTNHdMhcRGm7r2F > T8PO7eV8x6Y7jd3i199FwvzwS6nUtTiu+M/FtS4ekvQxiEP9rNwEdf3XRTfGoDtZ > RWjEAIodQeN1ddZE2hFpi2TPxVD9xPik+lDjXh7jDCfrq+8Wslg5PzXJynGHRZKG > GLtkvK8o93P2VPrDmp94qa9KclQJ4s5mrjhXH+2FzVfCaJMwVmdSFCUrFLk5wWBs > Ebkb3mNANrM7Du3EGdigIchETD7zBQN1jwXsw4++0K1VgwY6ih/k/83maVHwPUU= > =Vqtn > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gis-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52c2d4df.5000...@gmail.com > _______________________________________________ UbuntuGIS mailing list Ubuntu@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu http://trac.osgeo.org/ubuntugis/wiki