On 12-02-16 16:42, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 12-02-16 10:08, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: >> Energy should now probably be spent in making sure that Xerial, the >> next LTS release is well tested and has the packages we want. The >> debian import freeze is later this month, so now is the last time to >> act. > > The DebianImportFreeze is scheduled for February 18th according to the > release schedule [0]. > > Almost everything from Debian unstable is in xenial already, some > desired packages are still in proposed which may need some help to get > into the release before the freeze: > > - gdal (1.11.3+dfsg-3) > This should get into xenial, has fix for segfault with SQLite 3.10.0. > > - grass (7.0.3-1) > This should get into xenial, latest upstream release. > > - libgdal-grass > This should get into xenial, required for GRASS 7.0.3. > > - netcdf (1:4.4.0-1) > This should get into xenial, latest upstream release. > > - netcdf-fortran (4.4.3-1) > This should get into xenial, latest upstream release and > required for NetCDF-C 4.4.0. > > - netcdf-cxx (4.2.1-3) > This should get into xenial, rebuilt for NetCDF-C 4.4.0. > > - netcdf-cxx-legacy (4.2-4) > This should get into xenial, rebuilt for NetCDF-C 4.4.0. > > - netcdf4-python (1.2.2-2) > This should get into xenial, rebuilt for NetCDF-C 4.4.0. > > - python-cligj (0.4.0-1) > This should get into xenial, latest upstream release.
The above have found their way from proposed into release, the below has not. The ImportFreeze is today, so I doubt these will get into xenial before the release. > - fiona (1.6.3-2) > Not really important, but includes support for GDAL 2.0. > > Special mention for ossim (1.8.20.3+ds-2) which is required for OTB 5.2. > > Ubuntu chose to diverge from Debian for its GCC 5 transition, but now > wants the Debian maintainers to carry the Breaks/Replaces changes only > required for Ubuntu before merging the new ossim package. [1] > > I've so far refrained from doing so, because I think the burden should > be on Ubuntu to carry that change because they chose to ignore the > maintainers in Debian when doing their GCC 5 transition. > > To get OSSIM 1.8.20-3 into xenial someone else may need to prepare > ossim (1.8.20.3+ds-2ubuntu1) [2] with the Breaks/Replaces changes > required for Ubuntu if the Ubuntu people cannot be bothered to deal with > the issues they created. > > [0] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/XenialXerus/ReleaseSchedule > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ossim/+bug/1529157 > [2] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/Merging Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 _______________________________________________ UbuntuGIS mailing list Ubuntu@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu http://trac.osgeo.org/ubuntugis/wiki