On 9/4/07, Mark Shelby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 7.) Is the system "developer friendly?" Why, or why not? If yes, what > can be done to encourage more participation? If no, what fundemental > things need to be changed?
actually, if you minus off the routers and their (outdated) uclibc, there are not many pure uclibc distro around. count them! :-) so I would say more uclibc based and up to date distros could encourage more participation in the shape of users' feeback. the fundamental thing to be changed then would be: bring/accept users' feedback in, not just developpers'. (a forum is not just good enough: you need to log in, track it, etc...) > 9.) How do you use your uClibc system? to do linux/distro/c/c++ development. my main usage today is with DetaolB, which I consider a small payback tribute to uclibc's community: the intent is to showcase what the latest uclibc can do. example: firefox works well with uclibc-0.9.29. Did you know about it ? (yes, if you followed buildroot progress) I remember in 2002/2003, we used to report each new tool that could be compiled/used with uclibc. We need to find back this spirit. > 10.) How well does uClibc support your computing activities (scale of 1 to > 10) ? closer & closer to 10 after each new release (hint) -- Christian -- http://detaolb.sourceforge.net/, a linux distribution for Qemu _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
