Joakim Tjernlund wrote: >>> The 02_underscores patch is really ugly. >> Any suggestions how to improve it? > > remove _ syms from gcc would be best. Do you really need them?
Yes. The assembly language isn't really parseable otherwise. >>> Don't like the dl_find_hash_mod v.s dl_find_hash thingy. >> What do you dislike, and how would you do it differently? > > Thes should only be one dl_find_hash used by all arch. NPTL > has extended dl_find_hash to support NPTL and perhaps you > can use that one? The idea here was to provide the extended version under a new name, and keep the old interface around so that we don't have to make changes in all the ports. If you prefer to have every occurrence of _dl_find_hash changed, I guess I can do that, although it's more error-prone. > You can use the same trick DL_RELOC_ADDR() uses: > #ifndef DL_BOOT_COMPUTE_GOT > #define DL_BOOT_COMPUTE_GOT(got) got = elf_machine_dynamic() Oh, that's what you mean, ok - no problem. Bernd -- This footer brought to you by insane German lawmakers. Analog Devices GmbH Wilhelm-Wagenfeld-Str. 6 80807 Muenchen Sitz der Gesellschaft Muenchen, Registergericht Muenchen HRB 40368 Geschaeftsfuehrer Thomas Wessel, William A. Martin, Margaret Seif _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc