On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 03:34:01PM +0100, Bernhard Fischer wrote: >kraj duplicated the INTERNAL_SYSCALL for arm (thumb vs. non-thumb?) for >reasons that i do not really understand (r16334), so we have to fix this >up twice now, but it sounds like it would be better to just ditch the >duplicate.
oh, and AFAICT this hunk can go in independently, too, guarded with a ndef __UCLIBC_HAS_THREADS__ for the old code that thrashes the unwinding (shouldn't be strictly needed if not using threads and saving those bits away sounds like it would cost several bytes per syscall which we can spare. Perhaps somebody who actually uses ARM would know if we should sacrifice some bytes for the non-threading case). _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
