On Tuesday 20 May 2008 22:46, Bernhard Fischer wrote: > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 09:43:38PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > >On Tuesday 20 May 2008 21:35, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > >> On Tuesday 20 May 2008 20:52, Bernhard Fischer wrote: > >> > >which should change nothing - __pthread_initialize is not mentined > >> > >anywhere else > >> > >in forward.i.c - and run the second command - it will NOT warn! > >> > > > >> > >Looks like gcc bug to me. > >> > > >> > hmz. I'll try to reproduce this sometimes in the next days. Do you have > >> > a small standalone testcase that exposes this alleged bug that you could > >> > put into the gcc bugzilla, by chance? > >> > >> Not yet. > > > >Here is it. Just run "gcc -c test.c" on this: > > > >#pragma weak __pthread_initialize > > aha. I'm not a fan of pragma, and i wouldn't be surprised if this would > work if you would (properly, i'd tend to say) use the attribute. > Something like > extern int __pthread_initialize(void) __attribute__((weak)); > any better?
Possibly. Pthreads seems to need some cleanups... -- vda _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
