Chris Zankel wrote: > Hi Carmelo, > > Sorry, I also forgot to add the 'signed-off' line. Looking at the log > file, however, it seems that less than 5% of the commits are > 'signed-off'. What's the policy? > I'm used to sign-off my work being this a common/required policy on kernel side. I think generally in the open source world it should be add. Just a way to take responsibility for change and also recognition for contribution to the community. I wanted just remember this for the next time. uclibc community is not so sever in policy as glibc ;-).
Carmelo > Thanks, > -Chris > > Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: >> Bob Wilson wrote: >>> Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: >>>> Hi Bob, >>>> I don't see any problems in committing this on behalf >>>> of you, but proper signed-off-by should be added >>>> to these set of patches, as a general rule of thumbs. >>>> >>>> Possibly Acked-by Xtensa Maintainer (Chris Zankel) >>> It looks like Chris already committed them, but thanks for offering. >> Yes he did. I've sent this message a lot before, but due to mail server >> problems, this has been received jjust few minutes ago. :-) >>> I'll be sure to add a signed-off-by line in the future. >>> >> Thanks, >> Carmelo >> >> _______________________________________________ >> uClibc mailing list >> uClibc@uclibc.org >> http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc >> > > _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
