-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 rhabarber1848 wrote: > Denys Vlasenko wrote: > >> But if "anyone" is a patched version of gcc and patch >> simply uses uclibc internals (which were leaking through >> non-sanitized headers) instead of using public interface, >> that is a badly written patch. > > Hi, > > we already had the same discussion on the bug tracker: > https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=53#c7 > > I also need to have libstdc++ support from gcc, in my case even gcc-3.4.6, > where the above mentioned patches where backported to: > http://cvs.tuxbox.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/tuxbox/cdk/Patches/gcc-uclibc.diff?view=markup > > To "fix" the problem I copied libc/sysdeps/linux/common/bits/uClibc_locale.h > from the uClibc distribution to /include/bits in the target dir after > installing uClibc, I know its a hack but it works ;) > > I would be happy to see a real solution to this problem, but unfortunately I > can not help coding here. > > Greetings, rhabarber1848 > My working proposal if for removing _LIBC from within uclibc_locale.h. Ready to commit. Let me know.
carmelo > _______________________________________________ > uClibc mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmVUYIACgkQoRq/3BrK1s+RbgCfQtKxwQXSa7nuDn0LPV6Th4Gf K8UAniJXsc4PDkFD777qlq21xvNxmPTf =hGkp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
