On Monday 23 February 2009 11:29:05 Denys Vlasenko wrote: > I am guilty of this breakage. Not familiar enough with pthreads > implementations (and we are going to have THREE of those.... oh no).
I tried to get the number down. Honestly I did. There are more than the current set of developers can hope to maintain, so random breakage is going to render one of them unusable soon. I'm hoping that we simply _remove_ that one rather than delay the next release endlessly. (I don't really care if it's LINUXTHREADS_OLD or the other pthreads one. Just pick one.) Alas, we still haven't got a 0.9.30.1 release out yet, so I do not have high hopes here. (I might just cut a .1 myself when I get back to Austin...) Rob _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
