On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 07:01:05PM +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > During the weekend I've been pondering to release master as 0.9.31 now > (without NPTL), branch it so we can cleanup master after the NPTL merge. > In my mind this would be the best approach: > > .plan is now: > tag 0.9.30.3 off the 0_9_30 branch, push a tarball. > declare master frozen, push a 0.9.31-rc1 tarball (resp point people to > e.g. > http://git.uclibc.org/uClibc/snapshot/uClibc-63859f89f327e48037a4cdba982cd6afa3007da7.tar.bz2 > to be called 0.9.31-rc1; That's current master ATM). > wait and fixup; branch 0.9.31, release it. > merge NPTL into master (later on to be known as 0.9.32). > > FYI..
Sounds good to me. Certainly as far as coldfire is concerned, the master works fine, while the 0.9.30 branch is broken. The signal cleanup in master also seems useful to newer versions of busybox. I get the impression that busybox 0.16.0 can't compile against 0.9.30.x at all right now, although I haven't tried on other architectures. -- Len Sorensen _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
