On 4/26/2010 8:49 AM, Austin Foxley wrote:
> On 04/25/2010 11:11 PM, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
>>
>> Twas brillig at 23:09:32 25.04.2010 UTC-07 when aust...@cetoncorp.com did 
>> gyre and gimble:
>>
>>  AF> old_nptl is the svn nptl branch. Both of them can go away, except
>>  AF> for sometimes it is nice to look at the original commit of
>>  AF> something before I rebased nptl to master (this collapsed hundreds
>>  AF> of commits into just a few), but I can live without that at this
>>  AF> point. I say let's make an archive of the current repo, and then
>>  AF> kill both those branches.
>>
>> Bot branches' heads can be tagged and then branches can be deleted.
> 
> Good idea. I went ahead and did this. The two tags are 'nptl_merge' and 
> 'svn_nptl'.
> You can get rid of the now stale references to the nptl branch by running:
> git remote prune origin
> 
> -Austin

great ! thanks Austin. Let's keep on improving master now.

carmelo

> _______________________________________________
> uClibc mailing list
> uClibc@uclibc.org
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
> 

_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc

Reply via email to