On 01/04/2011 12:03 PM, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > ARM926EJ-S belongs to the ARM9 processor family. > It implements the ARMv5TEJ instruction set > (v5TE architecture with Jazelle technology) > > Signed-off-by: Carmelo Amoroso <carmelo.amor...@st.com> > --- > Rules.mak | 1 + > extra/Configs/Config.arm | 4 ++++ > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Rules.mak b/Rules.mak > index eecdc64..e99ad26 100644 > --- a/Rules.mak > +++ b/Rules.mak > @@ -341,6 +341,7 @@ ifeq ($(TARGET_ARCH),arm) > CPU_CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_ARM922T)+=-mtune=arm9tdmi -march=armv4t > CPU_CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_ARM926T)+=-mtune=arm9e -march=armv5te > CPU_CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_ARM10T)+=-mtune=arm10tdmi -march=armv5t > + CPU_CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_ARM926EJ_S) += -mtune=arm926ej-s -march=armv5te > CPU_CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_ARM1136JF_S)+=-mtune=arm1136jf-s -march=armv6 > CPU_CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_ARM1176JZ_S)+=-mtune=arm1176jz-s -march=armv6 > CPU_CFLAGS-$(CONFIG_ARM1176JZF_S)+=-mtune=arm1176jzf-s -march=armv6 >
Hello Carmelo AMOROSO, I don't think it is the responsibility of C library to set such compiler switches at all. If the gcc is configured correctly, it will set all these switches correctly as well. So I think the right patch is to remove all these compiler switches in uClibc build system. Best regards, AWG _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc