-------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Tue, 10 May 2011 20:31:12 +0100 > Von: Will Newton <will.new...@gmail.com> > An: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot....@gmail.com> > CC: uclibc@uclibc.org > Betreff: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 0.9.32-rc3 released
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer > <rep.dot....@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 07:57:12PM +0100, Will Newton wrote: > >>On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer > >><rep.dot....@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 05:49:02PM +0100, Will Newton wrote: > >>>>On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer > >>>><rep.dot....@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> Hi, > >>>>> > >>>>> We are shaking out some bugs still, but it will be released RSN > (TM). > >>>> > >>>>Are there any plans to fix this bug? > >>>> > >>>>https://bugs.uclibc.org/2089 > >>> > >>> This is supposed to work just fine with NPTL. > >> > >>So is support for linuxthreads dropped with this release? It seems a > >>shame when people are willing to support it. > > > > Thing is that you can only workaround it unless you have TLS. For arches > > that already have NPTL i suggest you use it. If folks find it clearer we > > can reflect that recommendation in the configury. > > The patch in the bug from Peter works and I have yet to see a clear > statement of what is wrong with it. Without the patch linuxthreads is > pretty much unusable. generally speaking of this sort of failures: - it would be better, if we would disable *hidden_proto/def/attribute_hidden for static builds (but that would mean double time for the build) Peter > _______________________________________________ > uClibc mailing list > uClibc@uclibc.org > http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc -- Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
