On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:06:40PM +0200, Peter Mazinger wrote: > > 2) How much of the observed glibc behavior should we try to emulate in > > uClibc? > > I am for only one implementation (that should go only into libc), > else you have unpredictable/different results depending on which > linking order you choose libc/libpthread
I agree, and after further consideration, sigfillset, sigaddset, and sigaction/signal (for the sig arg, not the sa_mask) are the right places in which to place the restrictions. Anything else (like checking and patching up at each sigprocmask call, for instance, or fixing the sa_mask at sigaction time) results in additional bloat and runtime cost with little/no benefit. Rich _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
