On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO <carmelo.amor...@st.com> wrote: > On 28/11/2011 18.33, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO <carmelo.amor...@st.com> >> wrote: >>> On 28/11/2011 3.15, Khem Raj wrote: >>>> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>>>> On Saturday 26 November 2011 19:07:44 Khem Raj wrote: >>>>>> If I build the root file system without this patch everything works >>>>>> as expected. Could you explain why this commit is needed ? >>>>> >>>>> it's a merge commit that happens when you merge a branch that isn't a fast >>>>> forward. it isn't an actual "commit" ... >>>> >>>> right. I think its set of prelink changes that I am looking at. That >>>> merge commit is the data point I have >>>> I was looking for Carmelo has seen something similar. I can provide >>>> the two root file systems >>>> built with and without that merge commit. >>>> >>> >>> khem, >>> are you able to reproduce the failure with a simpler test case ? it >>> would be the best. >>> >> >> I am trying to get to it. but its a full X system that comes up but >> fonts are wrong. >> it will definitely take some time since it has to be debugged all way through >> I am not an X expert either :) >> > > are you running with prelink disabled ?
yes LDSO_PRELINK_SUPPORT and even LDSO_STANDALONE_SUPPORT are not set same .config works if I revert back the prelink changes. > w/o prelink, the only part impacted is in the symbol lookup process, but > it were broken, nothing would work. > > carmelo > >>> >>>>> -mike >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
