On Monday 16 January 2012 21:39:34 Khem Raj wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > you don't check linker flags via gcc. you check the linker flags via the > > linker. this is why the cache funcs setup additional variables for use > > via the compiler driver. > > right and one of those additional variables gets set wrongly to be used by > gcc and its used as well what gcc gets is > > gcc ... -Wl,--sort-sections alignment .... > > and then complains that it does not know anything about 'alignment' > the right options to gcc would have been > > gcc ... -Wl,--sort-sections -Wl,alignment .... > > so computing CFLAG_-Wl* flags does not do the right thing in above case
i'll change it to use = in there. i could update the ld/as helpers to also mung the "%" into ",", but i'm not entirely convinced we need to bother. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc