On Monday 23 January 2012 13:26:44 Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > I'm wondering if we do still need to have in uclibc a version of > kernel_types.h, any idea ?
the alternative is ... ? relying on linux/types.h ? if we don't care about things older than like linux-2.6.18, then we prob can drop kernel_types.h. but i suspect some people do care about older targets. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
