On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 07:19:35PM +0000, u-uclibc-q...@aetey.se wrote: > > there's no correct/sane > > program that would be affected by this ABI change. > > Actually I suspect that stdio macros might use stuff (like __bufpos) > which is located past the proposed new structure member, in which case > existing binaries would become incompatible with a patched library: > > >>> #endif /* __UCLIBC_HAS_WCHAR__ */ > >>> int __filedes; > >>> + int __errno_value; > >>> #ifdef __STDIO_BUFFERS > >>> unsigned char *__bufstart; /* pointer to buffer */ > >>> unsigned char *__bufend; /* pointer to 1 past end of buffer */ > -> unsigned char *__bufpos;
Indeed, I missed this. It should definitely not be added near the beginning of the structure, only past elements that could be part of the macro ABI. Rich _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
