-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/07/2012 02:22 PM, Kevin Cernekee wrote: > On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> > wrote: >>> After seeing a problem report involving one of the O_NONBLOCK >>> "derivatives," I looked through the tree to see what else might >>> be affected. Here is what I found: >> >> We already have this kind of patch in future branch IIRC > > I think TFD_NONBLOCK and IN_NONBLOCK are still missing on both > master and future?
that could be I dont have handy access to check ATM -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+AvbcACgkQuwUzVZGdMxRXGACff0wMt7Udo27dWLi/UKbz2VGV BvcAn107xVSeC1lTHRJfkGbjPdwZnjVk =MLeR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
