On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 14:53 +0000, Markos Chandras wrote: > > Now a crazy idea - for the arches under consideration (i.e no > backward > > compatibility baggage) can we simply typedef statfs/stat structures > to > > statfs64 and stat64 respectively. This is extending Rich's > suggestion. > > That could work too. I can't think why this would break anything but I > will know > more once I try that locally. >
This should be for 32-bit systems only. There are no stat64/statfs64 structs in 64-bit kernels. (well, except for some 32-bit compatibility syscalls). --Mark _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
