On Monday 11 March 2013 07:04 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > On 11 March 2013 13:21, Vineet Gupta <vineet.gup...@synopsys.com> wrote: >> Since NPTL port to an ARCH can be non-trivial, we must allow the legacy >> pthread lib to be built for the common-generic syscall ABI >> >> Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgu...@synopsys.com> >> Cc: Markos Chandras <markos.chand...@imgtec.com> >> --- >> extra/Configs/Config.in | 2 -- >> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/extra/Configs/Config.in b/extra/Configs/Config.in >> index 1c6277a..f266d35 100644 >> --- a/extra/Configs/Config.in >> +++ b/extra/Configs/Config.in >> @@ -498,7 +498,6 @@ config HAS_NO_THREADS >> >> config LINUXTHREADS_OLD >> bool "older (stable) version of linuxthreads" >> - depends on ARCH_HAS_DEPRECATED_SYSCALLS >> # linuxthreads and linuxthreads.old need nanosleep() >> select UCLIBC_HAS_REALTIME >> help >> @@ -509,7 +508,6 @@ config LINUXTHREADS_OLD >> >> config LINUXTHREADS_NEW >> bool "slightly newer version of linuxthreads" >> - depends on ARCH_HAS_DEPRECATED_SYSCALLS >> help >> The new version has not been tested much, and lacks ports for >> arches >> which glibc does not support (like bfin/frv/etc...), but is based >> on >> -- >> 1.7.4.1 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> uClibc mailing list >> uClibc@uclibc.org >> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc > I don't think this is correct. > libpthread/linuxthreads/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/smp.h uses the > sysctl() syscall which does not exist for new architectures. > Did you actually manage to compile linuxthreads(new) on a new arch?
Nope - I'm currently using linuxthreads.old and threading seems to be running fine on it. I did the fix for both - just to maintain the symmetry - which hence is incorrect. So I need to do that only for linxthreads.old - do you have any reservations against that. -Vineet _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
