On 14 March 2013 19:14, Bernd Kuhls <berndku...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Florian Fainelli <flor...@openwrt.org> wrote in news:514048AA.7070400 > @openwrt.org: > >> Is there any thing that you want to merge before rolling out a 0.9.33.3 >> release? > > Hi, > > two patches regarding DNS stuff are missing, their description can be found > here: > https://ssl.nettworks.org/repo/browse/fli4l/branches/testing/src/src/fbr/buil > droot/toolchain/uClibc/README.patches?r=26288 > > First patch: > https://ssl.nettworks.org/repo/browse/fli4l/branches/testing/src/src/fbr/buil > droot/toolchain/uClibc/uClibc-0.9.33.2-resolve-any.patch?hb=true > The discussion about this patch can be found here: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.uclibc.general/22497
I have applied this one now. It was buried in a local resolv TLC branch.. > > Second patch: > https://ssl.nettworks.org/repo/browse/fli4l/branches/testing/src/src/fbr/buil > droot/toolchain/uClibc/uClibc-0.9.33.2-inet_fix_res_init.patch?hb=true > Original patch was posted here: > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.uclibc.general/22572 > But that original patch from OpenWRT ( https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/11495 ) > seems to be wrong, the patch included in the FLI4L project can be found in > the link posted above. Do you have a testcase for this second one? I'm not sure what this is supposed to fix. Thanks, _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc