On 7 January 2014 19:37, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7 January 2014 19:25, Tony Finch <d...@dotat.at> wrote:
>> Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> full reproducer w/ the correct data generated by the c71f8bc fix is here:
>>> http://uclibc.org/~aldot/uClibc/unifdef-bug.tar.gz
>>
>> Awesome, thanks. I was having problems working out what was going wrong :-)
>
> I just see that this does not seem to be a proper fix this since the
> line-numbers in the defundefile are wrong now (which i do not care
> about though as we don't use the line-numbers here), so please have a
> closer look before you push that to the unifdef repo.
(like
http://git.uclibc.org/uClibc/commit/?id=08e9f6f368dcd3bb95c9f68e666ca1a0fb5d6df6
fwiw)
>
> TIA && cheers,
_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
