Hi uclibc list, On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 08:34:02AM +0200, Baruch Siach wrote: > This makes uClibc compatible with glibc, and allows gnulib autoconf macros to > correctly detect posix_spawn support.
In a discussion of a coreutils build failure Mike Frysinger has rejected this approach (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs/33613). Quoting Mike Frysinger: > unless POSIX explicitly states that the symbols be in -lc, i don't think > uClibc is broken. i don't believe POSIX states that (if it does, please > point > out in the docs). > > keeping them in -lrt over -lc makes a bit of sense in my mind: > - the POSIX docs label them as "ADVANCED REALTIME" (ok, ok, maybe i'm > reaching here as what POSIX calls "realtime" is often not really "realtime" > related) > - these funcs are not common (that i've seen). that means always > mapping > them in via libc.so is useless overhead. better to penalize the uncommon. baruch -- http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems =}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{= - bar...@tkos.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il - _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc