On 13 January 2014 17:18, Chris Zankel <ch...@zankel.net> wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering if anyone had a chance to look at these changes again? I > have attached the two patches we propose so we can add support for TLS > descriptors. > > It would be great to get an ACK for it (or NACK with maybe some other > suggestions).
I did not have a chance to look at it yet, no. I've been side-tracked attempting to understand gold's POV on TLS (or static tls or however it is called, think dreaded tsd. Holler if that rings a bell, i could use somebody filling in my gaps of interest in that area ;).. Going through the backlog now but it's getting too late for me today to continue. _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
