On 07/24/14 16:41, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 07:28:26AM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
I should add that this updated patch addresses Rich's points: 1) I've tested
this for both dynamic and static linking and I tested that libressl builds
and works correctly.  2) I added a link to the musl commit for the reasoning
behind this approach.

On 07/22/14 13:27, bas...@opensource.dyc.edu wrote:
From: "Anthony G. Basile" <bluen...@gentoo.org>

issetugid() returns 1 if the process environment or memory address space
is considered tainted, and returns 0 otherwise.  This happens, for example,
when a process's privileges are elevated by the setuid or setgid flags on
an executable belonging to root.  This function first appeard in OpenBSD 2.0
and is needed for the LibreSSL.

This patch follows the same logic as the equivalent musl commit.  For more
information see the commit message at

http://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/commit/?id=ddddec106fd17c3aca3287005d21e92f742aa9d4
---
  include/unistd.h                    |  8 ++++++++
  libc/misc/file/issetugid.c          | 12 ++++++++++++
  libc/misc/internals/__uClibc_main.c | 12 ++++++++++++
  3 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 libc/misc/file/issetugid.c

diff --git a/include/unistd.h b/include/unistd.h
index 540062a..6c2c8c2 100644
--- a/include/unistd.h
+++ b/include/unistd.h
@@ -1168,6 +1168,14 @@ extern long int syscall (long int __sysno, ...) __THROW;

  #endif        /* Use misc.  */

+#ifdef __USE_MISC

is MISC (or MISC alone) an appropriate guard?

I had a hard time (and still have a hard time) deciding this even after carefully reading include/features.h. The function started in openbsd and migrated to free and netbsd, but its not in 4.3BSD. _USE_MISC is looser but does include SYS V. I'm thinking now to just remove the guard. I did speak to Rich about what musl's doing but it doesn't seem appropriate here.

If there are no strong opinions, I'll just remove the guard and resubmit in a few days.

Your other comments below are good.


+/* issetugid() returns 1 if the process environment or memory address space
+   is considered tainted, and returns 0 otherwise.  This happens, for example,
+   when a process's privileges are elevated by the setuid or setgid flags on
+   an executable belonging to root.
+*/
+extern int issetugid(void);
+#endif

  #if (defined __USE_MISC || defined __USE_XOPEN_EXTENDED) && !defined F_LOCK
  /* NOTE: These declarations also appear in <fcntl.h>; be sure to keep both
diff --git a/libc/misc/file/issetugid.c b/libc/misc/file/issetugid.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..29a4167
--- /dev/null
+++ b/libc/misc/file/issetugid.c
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+/* Copyright (C) 2013 Gentoo Foundation
+ * Licensed under LGPL v2.1 or later, see the file COPYING.LIB in this tarball.
+ */
+
+#include <unistd.h>
+
+extern int _pe_secure;
+
+int issetugid(void)
+{
+       return _pe_secure;
+}
diff --git a/libc/misc/internals/__uClibc_main.c 
b/libc/misc/internals/__uClibc_main.c
index a37751f..b062e62 100644
--- a/libc/misc/internals/__uClibc_main.c
+++ b/libc/misc/internals/__uClibc_main.c
@@ -40,6 +40,13 @@
  #include <locale.h>
  #endif

+/* Are we in a secure process environment or are we dealing
+ * with setuid stuff?  If we are dynamically linked, then we
+ * already have _dl_secure, otherwise we need to re-examine
+ * auxvt[].
+ */
+int _pe_secure = 1;

I'd default that to 0
and i'd make that libc_hidden_data_def(_pe_secure)

+
  #ifndef SHARED
  void *__libc_stack_end = NULL;

@@ -387,6 +394,11 @@ void __uClibc_main(int (*main)(int, char **, char **), int 
argc,
  #else
      if (_dl_secure)
  #endif
+       _pe_secure = 1 ;
+    else
+       _pe_secure = 0 ;
+
+    if (_pe_secure)
      {
        __check_one_fd (STDIN_FILENO, O_RDONLY | O_NOFOLLOW);
        __check_one_fd (STDOUT_FILENO, O_RDWR | O_NOFOLLOW);


Please reformat the hunk above like:
@@ -388,10 +388,12 @@ void __uClibc_main(int (*main)(int, char **, char **), 
int argc,
      if (_dl_secure)
  #endif
      {
+       _pe_secure = 1;
        __check_one_fd (STDIN_FILENO, O_RDONLY | O_NOFOLLOW);
        __check_one_fd (STDOUT_FILENO, O_RDWR | O_NOFOLLOW);
        __check_one_fd (STDERR_FILENO, O_RDWR | O_NOFOLLOW);
-    }
+    } else
+       _pe_secure = 0;
  #endif

      __uclibc_progname = *argv;

TIA,



--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph. D.
Chair of Information Technology
D'Youville College
Buffalo, NY 14201
(716) 829-8197
_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc

Reply via email to