Thanks for the answer, Erwin!
Erwin Authried wrote:
> > I'm trying to move from dhcpcd-new to busybox's udhcpc. The first
> > difference I noticed is that udhcpc won't work unless
> > "ifconfig eth0 up" is issued before udhcpc is invoked. dhcpcd-new
> > don't need the ifonfig command.
> >
> > Is this the way it should be? Are there any problems (e.g race
> > conditions, since bringing up the interface is not atomic anymore)
> > to be expected from that?
>
> The busybox udhcpc relies on an action script (default
> = /usr/share/udhcpc/default.script). The interface is brought up there
> in deconfigured state:
I am aware of that. But the problem is not with the script. udhcpc
calls the script _after_ it has acquired the lease. My problem is that
if the interface is down, then udhcpc will fail to get a lease in the
first lace. It therefore _never_ calls the script with the "bound"
option.
BTW: How do I configure udhcpc to send the hostname to the server? The
"-H hostname" option seems to _request_ a hostname from the server.
Why is -H taking an argument then?
_______________________________________________
uClinux-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by [email protected]
To unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
