Hi Jun,
Jun Sun wrote:
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 10:02:08PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
Jun Sun wrote:
This might be a dumb question, but have we considered moving to gcc4.x
for uclinux? Any pro's and con's? What would be the effort to do so?
I have been using a gcc-4.2.4 based toolchain for ColdFire work
for a few weeks now. I haven't had any problems with it so far.
I have been using a gcc-4.2.1 toolchain for uClinux ARM for
about a year now, no problems there either.
Thanks, Greg.
Did you use any pre-built toolchain or toolchain source package? Or
did you just build from GNU source?
I build my own from gnu source. You can download my arm-linux 4.2.1
toolchain from:
http://ftp.snapgear.org/pub/snapgear/tools/arm-linux/arm-linux-tools-20070808.tar.gz
The instructions I used to build it are at:
http://ftp.snapgear.org/pub/snapgear/tools/arm-linux/build-arm-linux-4.2.1
This toolchain is multilibed for soft and hard float, and also
for big and little endian. I use it for both MMUless and MMU arm
targets (like ARM7TDMI, xscale, ARM9, etc).
I use it specifically against uClinux-dist, so it works well for
that.
Other vairous toolchain collections for use with uClinux-dist
also at http://www.snapgear.org/downloads2.html.
I have a bunch of newer version ones I am running now (at least
for sh-linux, arm-linux, m68k-uclinux and i386-linux) on my dev
machines. I'll probably put these up just after I release a new
uClinux-dist stable.
Regards
Greg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer -- Chief Software Dude EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SnapGear -- a Secure Computing Company PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888
825 Stanley St, FAX: +61 7 3891 3630
Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
_______________________________________________
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
To unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
