On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 08:49:54AM +1000, David McCullough wrote:
>
> Jivin Jun Sun lays it down ...
> >
> > See question below.
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 09:39:46AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Monday 20 October 2008, Arthur Wong wrote:
> > > > --- user/e2fsprogs.bak/configure 2008-10-20 17:32:45.000000000 +0800
> > > > +++ user/e2fsprogs/configure 2008-10-20 17:44:57.000000000 +0800
> > > > @@ -3076,7 +3076,7 @@ if test "${with_ldopts+set}" = set; then
> > > > echo "${ECHO_T}LDFLAGS is $withval" >&6
> > > > LDFLAGS=$withval
> > > > else
> > > > - LDFLAGS=
> > > > + LDFLAGS= -elf2flt
> > > > fi;
> > > >
> > > > # Check whether --with-root-prefix or --without-root-prefix was given.
> > >
> > > this is wrong as you've just broken non-FLAT targets ... the configure
> > > script
> > > has an option to respect LDFLAGS so use it
> > >
> >
> > Probably a dumb question - are there non-FLAT targets in uclinux?
>
> Yes, lots of targets with MMU's in there. They almost surely out number
> the ones with flat support by now :-)
>
Yes, I do know some targets have MMU, but I thought they just
turn it off and use mmu-less uclinux kernel. Wrong?
And I always thought uclinux *only* supports FLAT binary format. Wrong too?
If a target supports MMU and runs ELF, why doesn't it just use regular
linux kernel?
Cheers.
Jun
_______________________________________________
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
To unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
