Michael Schnell wrote: > > >No doubt VM tunables can be adjusted in 2.6 to > >release that page cache faster, but the defaults aren't fast enough. > > > That is why I suppose using 2.6 is the way to go here.
2.6 has a large number of very good reasons to use it, but it does seem to have regressed w.r.t. fragmentation avoidance on no-MMU, which might be a showstopper. It's not clear that tweaking VM tunables is enough - new code may be needed. The 2.4 code works, but to be fair it's got many problems too - and I'm in the interesting position of having to find/write a fix for a client, either using 2.4 or 2.6, whichever works. -- Jamie _______________________________________________ uClinux-dev mailing list uClinux-dev@uclinux.org http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
