Hi Oleksii, Yes I was ;-) What version of tools did you finally settle on?
Thanks for the heads up. I also found this in some of your and Gregs emails in the archives. I put them in and I was up and running. I think I'm on the right track. I am however, moving over to my real target board a 5307. the 5407 work was just to get to a working environment. Now I have to figure out why I'm getting a kernel panic related to can't mount root,,, bummer. BTW, Greg sent an email with a link to his toolchain that I'm going to download and try. We'll see what happens. Regards, -Roger -----Original Message----- From: uclinux-dev-boun...@uclinux.org [mailto:uclinux-dev-boun...@uclinux.org] On Behalf Of Oleksii Kuchuk Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 3:20 AM To: uClinux development list Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] m68k-uclinux-20061214 toolchain problem with mcf5407 and 2.6.x which tooldchain to move to? Hello Roger, I think you are talking about me ). That toolchain does compilation mistakes for 5407C3 board (I do not know why, but it does, I have found at least two). Newer toolchain will help. Still that distribution does not work correctly with serial port i/o on that board. To solve this, in file: arch/m68knommu/platform/5407/config.c: in function: static void _init m5407_uart_init_line(int line, int irq) { if (line == 0) { writel(MCFSIM_ICR_LEVEL1 | MCFSIM_ICR_PRI1, MCF_MBAR + MCFSIM_UART1ICR); writeb(irq, MCFUART_BASE1 + MCFUART_UIVR); // in this line do as Greg says: /* This write should be offset into the MCF_MBAR region, so it should be writeb(irq, MCF_MBAR + MCFUART_BASE1 + MCFUART_UIVR); Regards Greg */ mcf_setimr(mcf_getimr() & ~MCFSIM_IMR_UART1); } else if (line == 1) { writel(MCFSIM_ICR_LEVEL1 | MCFSIM_ICR_PRI2, MCF_MBAR + MCFSIM_UART2ICR); writeb(irq, MCFUART_BASE2 + MCFUART_UIVR); mcf_setimr(mcf_getimr() & ~MCFSIM_IMR_UART2); } } 2009/5/29 Roger Thornblad <rthornb...@utsci.com>: > To All, > > I've been trying to get a 20080808 dist with the latest patches > running on my 5407C3 eval board. > > toolchain is m68k-uclinux-20061214 > > 2.4.x kernel runs OK > 2.6.x doesn't. After some chasing around I found a problem in > kmem_cache_create() thinking it was called while in an interrupt. > > After some searches in the mailing list I found someone with a similar > problem where he found it was a toolchain issue. He moved to a newer > tool set and problem was resolved. > > It appears there are several options for a new toolset. > > I'm curious which toolchain would you recommend / is most popular out there? > > Thanks, > > -Roger > > > _______________________________________________ > uClinux-dev mailing list > uClinux-dev@uclinux.org > http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev > This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org To unsubscribe see: > http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev > _______________________________________________ uClinux-dev mailing list uClinux-dev@uclinux.org http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev _______________________________________________ uClinux-dev mailing list uClinux-dev@uclinux.org http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
