Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > These commits broke CONFIG_KEYS=y on m68k, so technically the missing > support is a regression compared to 2.6.31.
I couldn't work out how to do it. I mentioned that it needed doing in the logs in the hope that someone on the arch list would do it for the missing arches. David _______________________________________________ uClinux-dev mailing list uClinux-dev@uclinux.org http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
