On Friday 04 December 2009 04:40:32 David Howells wrote: > Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > + flush_icache_range(mm->brk, brk); > > > return mm->brk = brk; > > > } > > > > probably want mm->brk + brk for the second argument > > Ummm... Why? mm->brk and brk are both addresses - note the return > statement where brk just gets assigned to mm->brk.
yeah, sorry. i was thinking sbrk where the argument is an increment, not a new address. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ uClinux-dev mailing list uClinux-dev@uclinux.org http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
