Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > So these patches and the MN10300 ones didn't get merged. Presumably > because they're a grabbag of fixes and non-fixes and kinda-fixes with > no particular ordering or precedence and they arrived newly-minted > several days after the release of -rc1. > > I could suggest that you go back and sort them into 2.6.33-appropriate > fixes and 2.6.34-appropriate non-fixes. > > Or you could try to cook up a good-sounding reason why the whole lot > needs to go into 2.6.33. If you believe that ;)
I did send them, plus others, during the merge window (albeit near the end). I then sent this lot after filtering out the extensions that should probably wait for the next merge window. David _______________________________________________ uClinux-dev mailing list uClinux-dev@uclinux.org http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
